Worked example 1
Estimate Zeff for a valence electron in sodium (Z = 11) and in chlorine (Z = 17), and say what the comparison predicts.
Try it first: Count core electrons for each before doing any subtraction.
0 of 3 steps revealed.
What you'll be able to do: Estimate effective nuclear charge and use it to explain why every periodic trend behaves the way it does.
Best after: Electron Configurations and Orbital Filling
Every trend in this unit reduces to one competition: how strongly the nucleus pulls on an outer electron, and how much the inner electrons get in the way. Effective nuclear charge is the number that captures that competition.
These are recommended, not required. You can start this lesson at any time.
An outer electron is attracted to the nucleus but repelled by every electron between it and the nucleus. The net effect is that the outer electron feels less than the full nuclear charge. Core electrons shield strongly, while electrons in the same shell shield each other only weakly.
Zeff = Z - S, where Z is the number of protons and S is the shielding constant. A quick classroom estimate takes S as the number of core electrons, so sodium has Zeff approximately 11 - 10 = 1, while chlorine has 17 - 10 = 7.
Zeff = Z - S
Moving left to right, each step adds one proton and one electron, but the new electron enters the same shell and shields poorly. Z rises while S stays nearly constant, so Zeff climbs sharply. From Na to Cl the estimate goes from 1 to 7, a large increase.
Going down, each step adds a full new shell of core electrons, so S grows almost as fast as Z. Zeff stays roughly constant, around 1 for every alkali metal. What changes is the distance: valence electrons sit in a higher shell, far from the nucleus, and are held loosely.
The estimate Zeff ≈ Z − (core electron count) is a quick model, not an exact experimental value. Electrons in the same shell still repel and shield one another, and orbital penetration affects how strongly an electron samples the nucleus. A 3s electron can reach closer to the nucleus than a 3p electron, so two electrons with the same n need not feel identical attraction. The model is most useful for a comparison: Na and Mg both have a [Ne] core, but Mg has one more proton, so its valence electrons generally feel a stronger pull. State the shared shell and the shielding assumption when using it.
Across a period, added protons increase the pull on valence electrons, while added electrons enter roughly the same principal shell and do little to shield one another. Down a group, a new occupied shell places valence electrons farther from the nucleus and adds inner-electron shielding. Say which comparison you are making before deciding which effect dominates.
Repulsion from inner electrons that reduces the nuclear attraction felt by an outer electron.
The net positive charge experienced by a specified electron, Zeff = Z - S.
Across a period Z increases and S is nearly constant, so Zeff increases.
Down a group both Z and S increase, so Zeff is roughly constant while distance increases.
Zeff = Z - S
Estimate Zeff for a valence electron in sodium (Z = 11) and in chlorine (Z = 17), and say what the comparison predicts.
Try it first: Count core electrons for each before doing any subtraction.
0 of 3 steps revealed.
Explain, using Zeff, why first ionization energy decreases from Li to Cs.
0 of 3 steps revealed.
Use the core-electron estimate to compare a valence electron in Na (Z = 11) and Mg (Z = 12). What does this predict about their atomic radii?
Try it first: Both atoms have ten neon-core electrons and outer electrons in n = 3.
0 of 2 steps revealed.
Why is phosphorus generally smaller than silicon despite both using the third valence shell?
Try it first: Compare proton counts and inner-shell shielding.
0 of 3 steps revealed.
Why it's wrong: Adding electrons alone would enlarge the atom. The shrinking comes from the added protons raising Zeff on a shell that does not change.
Check instead: Attribute the trend to increasing Zeff at constant principal quantum number.
Why it's wrong: Each new period adds core electrons that shield nearly one-for-one, so Zeff is close to constant.
Check instead: Explain group trends with shell distance and shielding, not with a large Zeff change.
Why it's wrong: Electrons at the same distance screen each other poorly, which is why Zeff climbs across a period at all.
Check instead: Count only core electrons in the quick S estimate.
After the lesson · Question bank
Work through new problems on this topic on your own. The lesson's quick checks and worked examples stay above if you need to review a step.
No questions are available for this topic yet. Explore the unit question bank.
Lesson: Not marked completed
Marking a lesson completed records that you finished reading it. Practice establishes mastery separately. Saved on this device.
Continue through the unit’s lessons and available practice.
Effective nuclear charge is the nuclear charge an outer electron actually feels after inner electrons shield it. Zeff rises sharply across a period and barely changes down a group, which is why radius, ionization energy and electronegativity behave as they do.
Access for free at openstax.org License