Reaction MechanismsCourse level: AP Chemistry

Fast Pre-Equilibria, Intermediates and Catalysis

What you'll be able to do: Derive a rate law when the rate-determining step follows a fast equilibrium, and explain how catalysts alter mechanisms.

Best after: Elementary Steps and the Rate-Determining Step

Introduction

When the slow step comes second, its rate law contains an intermediate, and intermediates cannot appear in a final rate law because their concentrations are not experimentally controlled. The fast pre-equilibrium approximation is the standard way out.

These are recommended, not required. You can start this lesson at any time.

Learning objectives

  • Apply the fast pre-equilibrium approximation to eliminate an intermediate
  • Derive a multistep rate law and compare it with experimental data
  • Explain how homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts alter a mechanism
  • Interpret negative or fractional orders in mechanistic terms

Eliminate intermediate concentrations from the observed law

A mechanistic elementary law may legitimately contain an intermediate. The aim here is to predict an experimentally useful overall law in terms of reactant, product or catalyst concentrations, so relate that intermediate to those species before reporting the final expression. Some intermediates are detectable and measurable; the reason for substitution is not that they have no concentration or can never be observed.

For fast reversible 2 NO ⇌ N₂O₂ followed by slow N₂O₂ + O₂ → 2 NO₂, the slow step is bimolecular: rate = k₂[N₂O₂][O₂]. Omitting [O₂] contradicts its specified elementary character. The first equilibrium gives k₁[NO]² ≈ k₋₁[N₂O₂], so rate ≈ (k₂k₁/k₋₁)[NO]²[O₂]. Define kobs = k₂k₁/k₋₁ only after showing the substitution.

The pre-equilibrium approximation

If step 1 is fast and reversible and step 2 is slow, step 1 stays effectively at equilibrium throughout. Setting the forward rate equal to the reverse rate gives an expression for the intermediate in terms of ordinary reactants, which is then substituted into the slow step.

The approximation requires equilibration in the first step to be rapid compared with removal of its intermediate by the later step. For the NO dimer example, k₂[O₂] must be small compared with k₋₁ so most dimers can re-equilibrate instead of being immediately consumed. “Fast” alone is not a universal proof. If removal is substantial, the intermediate need not maintain its equilibrium concentration and a steady-state or fuller kinetic treatment is needed.

k₁[A][B] = k-1[I] => [I] = (k₁/k-1)[A][B]

A worked pattern

With step 1 fast: 2 NO ⇌ N₂O₂ and step 2 slow: N₂O₂ + O₂ → 2 NO₂, the slow step gives rate = k₂[N₂O₂][O₂]. Equilibrium in step 1 gives [N₂O₂] = (k₁/k-1)[NO]².

Substituting produces rate = k[NO]²[O₂], with k a combination of the three individual constants.

rate = (k₂ k₁ / k-1) [NO]² [O₂]

Eliminate the intermediate with a justified relation. Read this visual alongside the section; the text alternative describes its scientific content and assumptions.

Fractional and negative orders

A negative order arises when a product of the fast step appears in the denominator of the intermediate expression, so adding that product suppresses the rate. Fractional orders often signal an equilibrium involving dissociation, such as a diatomic splitting into atoms. Neither result is an error; both are mechanistic evidence.

For a fast X₂ ⇌ 2 X equilibrium, K = [X]²/[X₂], giving [X] = √(K[X₂]). A slow X + Y → products then predicts rate = k₂√K [X₂]1/2[Y]. The half-order originates in solving the equilibrium expression, not in a collision involving half a molecule.

For fast A ⇌ B + C and slow B + D → E, [B] = K[A]/[C], so rate = k₂K[A][D]/[C]. Doubling C halves the rate under this approximation because C suppresses the supply of B. The inverse law cannot be extrapolated to C = 0, where it would incorrectly predict infinite rate; the approximation breaks down.

Catalysis inside a mechanism

A homogeneous catalyst is in the same phase as the reactants and appears explicitly in the steps, consumed early and regenerated later, which is why it can appear in the rate law. A heterogeneous catalyst works on a surface through adsorption, reaction and desorption, and saturation of that surface is the usual cause of observed zero-order behaviour.

A heterogeneous catalyst's exposed active sites can become occupied. At low reactant pressure, greater coverage often raises rate; near saturation, additional reactant changes coverage little, giving an approximately zero-order regime. Poisoning instead removes or blocks useful sites and lowers activity. These are different mechanisms, even though both involve a surface. Catalysts can change selectivity as well as speed by providing a particular path, while leaving equilibrium thermodynamics for the same net reaction unchanged.

Enzymes are biological catalysts that show exactly this pattern: first order in substrate when dilute, zero order once saturated.

Error analysis

Two mistakes dominate. The first is leaving an intermediate in a requested overall reactant-based law without deriving how its concentration depends on the supplied species. The elementary law itself is valid, and an intermediate can sometimes be measured.

The second is assuming the pre-equilibrium approximation applies when the first step is not fast and reversible; in that case a steady-state treatment is needed instead, which is beyond the scope of this course but worth knowing exists.

Eliminate an intermediate with pre-equilibrium

If A + B ⇌ AB is fast and reversible before a slow AB + C → P step, write the slow-step rate in terms of [AB] and then use K = [AB]/([A][B]) from the fast equilibrium. Substitution expresses the observable law using stable reactants.

The derivation assumes the first step remains near equilibrium under the conditions studied.

Write the slow law, solve the equilibrium relation, then substitute.

Key ideas

Rule
No intermediates in the answer

For the overall laws derived here, substitute a justified expression for intermediates to obtain a law in stable-species concentrations.

Rule
Pre-equilibrium condition

Set forward rate equal to reverse rate for the fast step and solve for the intermediate.

Definition
Homogeneous catalyst

A catalyst in the same phase as the reactants; it can appear in the rate law.

Definition
Heterogeneous catalyst

A catalyst in a different phase, acting by adsorption on a surface.

Key concept
Negative order

An apparent negative order means increasing that species lowers rate in the measured regime, for example through an intermediate-suppressing pre-equilibrium.

Equation
Pre-equilibrium for 2 NO ⇌ N₂O₂

[N₂O₂] ≈ (k₁/k₋₁)[NO]²

  • k₁ = forward rate constant of the fast step
  • k-1 = reverse rate constant of the fast step
Equation
Observed k for the stated NO dimer mechanism

kobs = k₂k₁/k₋₁; rate ≈ kobs[NO]²[O₂]

  • k₂ = rate constant of the slow step

Worked examples

Worked example 1

Step 1 (fast, reversible): 2 NO ⇌ N₂O₂. Step 2 (slow): N₂O₂ + O₂ → 2 NO₂. Derive the overall rate law.

Try it first: Write the slow step rate law first and note which species in it is an intermediate.

    0 of 4 steps revealed.

    Worked example 2

    A mechanism has step 1 fast and reversible: A ⇌ B + C, and step 2 slow: B + D → E. Show why the rate is inversely proportional to [C].

      0 of 3 steps revealed.

      Worked example 3

      A surface-catalysed decomposition is first order in reactant at low pressure and zero order at high pressure. Explain.

        0 of 3 steps revealed.

        Worked example 4

        Derive the rate law for fast A + B ⇌ AB followed by slow AB + C → P.

        Try it first: The slow elementary step initially gives rate = k₂[AB][C].

          0 of 3 steps revealed.

          Common mistakes

          Common mistakes and better checks
          MistakeWhy it's wrongCheck instead
          Leaving an intermediate in the final rate law.The intermediate concentration is not an independently specified bulk reactant concentration; deriving the observed law requires relating it to stable species. Some intermediates can be measured.Eliminate it using the fast equilibrium before quoting an answer.
          Assuming a catalyst can never appear in a rate law.A homogeneous catalyst is consumed in an early step, so its concentration can control the rate.Catalysts may appear in the rate law even though they are not consumed overall.
          Treating a fractional or negative order as a mistake in the data.Both are natural consequences of pre-equilibria.Look for a fast reversible step that explains the unusual order.
          Applying the pre-equilibrium approximation when the first step is slow.The approximation depends on the first step being fast and reversible.Check the step labels before choosing the method.

          Scroll horizontally if needed to read all columns.

          After the lesson · Question bank

          Independent practice

          Work through new problems on your own. The lesson's quick checks and worked examples stay above if you need to review a step.

          30 topic questions across 3 difficulty levels.

          Loading practice questions…

          What you should now know

          If a fast reversible step precedes the rate-determining step, the fast step is treated as being at equilibrium, so the forward and reverse rates are equal. Solving that equality for the intermediate concentration and substituting it into the slow step's rate law eliminates the intermediate and produces a rate law in measurable species only. This procedure explains fractional and negative orders and, together with catalysis, accounts for most rate laws that look impossible at first glance. Catalysts open a lower-energy pathway and are regenerated, so they appear in the mechanism and can appear in the rate law without being consumed overall.

          • Final rate laws must not contain intermediates
          • Set forward equal to reverse for a fast step and solve for the intermediate
          • Substituting gives an observed k that combines several rate constants
          • Negative and fractional orders are mechanistic evidence, not errors
          • Catalysts appear in mechanisms and may appear in rate laws without being consumed

          Your next step

          Lesson: Not marked completed

          Marking a lesson completed records that you finished reading it. Practice establishes mastery separately. Saved on this device.

          Try a short set of different questions to check what you can do independently.

          Watch and Learn

          An optional video to support this lesson.

          Loading video resources…

          Supplementary learning resources

          More resources for this topic →

          External resources belong to their respective creators. Chem Help is not affiliated with or endorsed by these providers. Links open the original provider; their terms apply.

          Sources and further reading

          • Chemistry 2e, Section 12.6: Reaction Mechanisms
            Paul Flowers, Klaus Theopold, Richard Langley, William R. Robinson · OpenStax, Rice University · Chapter 12.6
            View source

            Lesson-specific rights and provenance need review.

            The current online Chemistry 2e edition lists CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. The source version used for this lesson and its applicable rights remain unverified.

            Recorded use: reference. This describes the stored citation, not verified authorship or reuse permission.

            Recorded attribution / license claim (applicability unverified): Chemistry 2e, OpenStax, Rice University, licensed CC BY 4.0.

            Source rights and review status
          • Chemistry 2e, Section 12.7: Catalysis
            Paul Flowers, Klaus Theopold, Richard Langley, William R. Robinson · OpenStax, Rice University · Chapter 12.7
            View source

            Lesson-specific rights and provenance need review.

            The current online Chemistry 2e edition lists CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. The source version used for this lesson and its applicable rights remain unverified.

            Recorded use: reference. This describes the stored citation, not verified authorship or reuse permission.

            Recorded attribution / license claim (applicability unverified): Chemistry 2e, OpenStax, Rice University, licensed CC BY 4.0.

            Source rights and review status
          • General Chemistry bookshelf (LibreTexts)
            LibreTexts, University of California, Davis
            View source

            Lesson-specific rights and provenance need review.

            The exact LibreTexts page and its license have not been established; the bookshelf citation does not grant permission for all linked material.

            Recorded use: further reading. This describes the stored citation, not verified authorship or reuse permission.

            Recorded attribution / license claim (applicability unverified): LibreTexts General Chemistry, licence varies by page, check the page footer.

            Source rights and review status