Molecular StructureFormal ChargeContent level: Challenge 22 min

Choosing the Best Lewis Structure with Formal Charge

What you'll be able to do: Rank competing Lewis structures and justify which contributes most to the resonance hybrid.

Best after: Formal Charge: Definition and Calculation, Resonance Structures

Introduction

Several structures can be legal at once. Formal charge is the tie breaker chemists actually use.

These are recommended, not required. You can start this lesson at any time.

Learning objectives

  • Apply the formal charge criteria in priority order
  • Rank unequal resonance contributors
  • Place negative formal charge on the correct atom
  • Justify a choice of structure in written form

Lesson

The ranking rules

Apply them in order. First, prefer the structure with formal charges closest to zero overall. Second, prefer negative formal charge on the more electronegative atom and positive on the less electronegative. Third, avoid placing like charges on adjacent atoms, and avoid charges larger than one unit when a reasonable alternative exists.

These rules never override the octet limits. A period 2 atom is still capped at eight electrons even if expanding would zero out a formal charge.

Ranking resonance contributors

When contributors are not equivalent, the better ranked structure contributes more to the hybrid. For the thiocyanate ion SCN⁻, the structure with the negative charge on the more electronegative nitrogen contributes more than the one with it on sulfur, and the structure with a +1 on nitrogen contributes least of all.

Writing the justification

A complete answer names the structure, gives the formal charges, and states the rule used. For example: this structure is preferred because all formal charges are zero, while the alternative places +1 on oxygen, the most electronegative atom present.

When charges are unavoidable

Ions must carry charge somewhere, so the goal is the best placement, not zero everywhere. In nitrate, the negative charges sit on oxygen atoms rather than on nitrogen, which is exactly what the second rule demands.

Use formal charge to rank valid contributors

First reject drawings that miscount electrons or violate required octets for second-period atoms. Among valid contributors, fewer and smaller formal charges often help; when the same magnitude of negative charge can sit on different atoms, the more electronegative atom generally carries it in the favored contributor. This is a ranking heuristic for resonance contributors, not a claim that only one drawing exists.

Validate electron count and octets before comparing formal-charge placement.

Key ideas

Rule
Rule 1

Minimise the magnitude of formal charges.

Rule
Rule 2

Put negative formal charge on the more electronegative atom.

Rule
Rule 3

Avoid adjacent like charges and charges beyond one unit where possible.

Key concept
Thiocyanate

The contributor with -1 on nitrogen outranks the one with -1 on sulfur.

Equation
Formal charge

FC = V - N - B/2

    Worked examples

    Worked example 1

    Two structures for N₂O with connectivity N-N-O are possible: a triple bonded N to N with a single N-O, or a double bond on both sides. Which contributes more?

    Try it first: Compute formal charges on all three atoms in each structure.

      0 of 4 steps revealed.

      Worked example 2

      For CO₂, compare O=C=O with a structure holding one C-O single bond and one C triple bond O.

      Try it first: Compute the charges for both.

        0 of 3 steps revealed.

        Worked example 3

        For cyanate OCN⁻, compare O=C=N⁻ with -O-C≡N as Lewis contributors.

        Try it first: Both have the O-C-N skeleton and 16 valence electrons.

          0 of 3 steps revealed.

          Common mistakes

          Expanding a period 2 octet to reduce a formal charge.

          Why it's wrong: There are no available orbitals, so the structure is invalid however good the charges look.

          Check instead: Keep C, N, O and F at eight electrons.

          Treating all resonance contributors as equally important.

          Why it's wrong: Only equivalent structures contribute equally; unequal ones are weighted by the ranking rules.

          Check instead:

          Trying to make every formal charge zero in an ion.

          Why it's wrong: The charges must sum to the ionic charge, so some must be nonzero.

          Check instead: Aim for the best placement rather than for zeros.

          After the lesson · Question bank

          Independent practice

          Work through new problems on this topic on your own. The lesson's quick checks and worked examples stay above if you need to review a step.

          No questions are available for this topic yet. Explore the unit question bank.

          Your next step

          Lesson: Not marked completed

          Marking a lesson completed records that you finished reading it. Practice establishes mastery separately. Saved on this device.

          Continue through the unit’s lessons and available practice.

          What you should now know

          The preferred Lewis structure is the one with formal charges closest to zero, with any negative formal charge on the most electronegative atom, and with like charges kept apart. These rules also rank unequal resonance contributors, deciding which one dominates the hybrid.

          • Rank candidate structures by formal charge magnitude first
          • Negative formal charge belongs on the more electronegative atom
          • Avoid adjacent like charges
          • Octet limits always outrank formal charge preferences
          • Unequal resonance contributors are weighted by these same rules

          Sources and further reading

          • Chemistry 2e, Section 7.4: Formal Charges and Resonance
            OpenStax · Rice University · 7.4
            View source

            CC BY 4.0 License