Worked example 1
A calibration plot of FeSCN₂⁺ gives a slope of 4.5 × 10³ L/mol. An equilibrium mixture has A = 0.360. Find [FeSCN₂⁺].
Try it first: Rearrange Beer''s law for concentration before substituting.
0 of 3 steps revealed.
What you'll be able to do: Use absorbance data and a Beer's law calibration to find equilibrium concentrations and calculate K.
Measuring an equilibrium constant means measuring concentrations without disturbing the equilibrium. Light does exactly that: a colored species absorbs in proportion to how much of it is there.
These are recommended, not required. You can start this lesson at any time.
A spectrophotometer measures how much light a solution absorbs at a chosen wavelength. Because the measurement takes no material out of the flask, the equilibrium is left completely undisturbed, which is exactly what a titration or an extraction would fail to do.
Absorbance is the product of the molar absorptivity, the path length and the concentration. With a fixed 1 cm cuvette and a fixed wavelength, absorbance is directly proportional to concentration.
A = e b c
Prepare standards of known concentration, measure each absorbance, and plot A against c. The line should pass through the origin and its slope equals e b. Any unknown is then c = A / slope.
c = A / slope
Fe³⁺(aq) + SCN⁻(aq) ⇌ FeSCN₂⁺(aq) produces an intensely red complex, while both reactants are effectively colorless at 447 nm. That selectivity is what makes the absorbance a direct measure of [FeSCN₂⁺].
K = [FeSCN₂⁺] / ([Fe³⁺][SCN⁻])
The measured [FeSCN₂⁺] is the x of the ICE table. Subtract it from the initial concentrations of Fe³⁺ and SCN⁻ to get their equilibrium values, then substitute all three into the K expression. Remember that mixing the two stock solutions dilutes both, so the initial concentrations must be corrected with M₁V₁ = M₂V₂ before the table is written.
Failing to blank the instrument with the solvent adds a constant offset to every reading. Absorbances above about 1.0 fall off the linear range and give concentrations that are too low. Fingerprints and bubbles on the cuvette scatter light. Because K depends on temperature, standards and samples must be measured at the same temperature.
Concentrations in stock bottles are not the initial concentrations in a reaction mixture. Convert moles added to the total mixed volume before using absorbance to infer the colored equilibrium species. Then subtract the measured complex concentration from each reactant's initial concentration according to reaction stoichiometry.
A unitless log measure of how much light a sample absorbs at a given wavelength.
A constant for a given species and wavelength, in L/mol cm.
The slope of A against c equals e b, and dividing an absorbance by it gives a concentration.
Keep absorbance between about 0.1 and 1.0 for reliable results.
Light-based measurement does not disturb the equilibrium being measured.
A = e b c
M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
K = [FeSCN₂⁺] / ([Fe³⁺][SCN⁻])
A calibration plot of FeSCN₂⁺ gives a slope of 4.5 × 10³ L/mol. An equilibrium mixture has A = 0.360. Find [FeSCN₂⁺].
Try it first: Rearrange Beer''s law for concentration before substituting.
0 of 3 steps revealed.
Mixing gives initial concentrations [Fe³⁺] = 1.00 × 10⁻³ M and [SCN⁻] = 2.00 × 10⁻⁴ M. At equilibrium [FeSCN₂⁺] = 8.0 × 10⁻⁵ M. Calculate K.
Try it first: Treat the measured complex concentration as x in an ICE table.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
A student forgets to blank the spectrophotometer with the solvent. How does this affect the calculated K?
Try it first: Decide whether the error raises or lowers every absorbance reading.
0 of 4 steps revealed.
Mix 2.00 mL of 0.00200 M Fe³⁺ stock with enough SCN⁻ solution to total 10.00 mL. If [FeSCN₂⁺]eq=1.00×10⁻⁴ M, find [Fe³⁺]eq.
Try it first: First calculate the diluted initial iron concentration.
0 of 3 steps revealed.
Why it's wrong: K requires equilibrium values, which are the initial values minus the complex formed.
Check instead: Complete the ICE table first.
Why it's wrong: Both concentrations drop when the volumes combine.
Check instead: Apply M₁V₁ = M₂V₂ with the total volume.
Why it's wrong: Beer''s law becomes non-linear there, so the concentration is underestimated.
Check instead: Dilute the sample back into the 0.1 to 1.0 range.
Why it's wrong: It depends on the species and the wavelength.
Check instead: Use the slope from your own calibration at your own wavelength.
Why it's wrong: K itself changes with temperature.
Check instead: Keep standards and samples thermostatted.
After the lesson · Question bank
Work through new problems on this topic on your own. The lesson's quick checks and worked examples stay above if you need to review a step.
No questions are available for this topic yet. Explore the unit question bank.
Lesson: Not marked completed
Marking a lesson completed records that you finished reading it. Practice establishes mastery separately. Saved on this device.
Continue through the unit’s lessons and available practice.
Beer's law states that absorbance is proportional to concentration, A = e b c, so a calibration line of absorbance against known concentration gives a slope of e b. Measuring the absorbance of an equilibrium mixture and dividing by that slope returns the concentration of the colored species without removing any sample. That single measured concentration feeds the change row of an ICE table, from which every other equilibrium concentration follows, and then K. The classic system is Fe³⁺ + SCN⁻ ⇌ FeSCN₂⁺, where only the deep red thiocyanatoiron complex absorbs strongly at about 447 nm. Good practice means blanking with the solvent, staying in the linear absorbance range of roughly 0.1 to 1.0, and holding the temperature constant because K depends on it.
This lesson is original Chem Help content. No external sources were adapted.